Scott Honaker scotthon at
Thu Sep 10 18:43:37 PDT 2009

This is some cool stuff.  I have to say I'm a bit skeptical.  He mentions 
9600 baud bandwidth but the DSTAR channel is only 4800 baud and 1200 of 
that is data (callsign, routing, positions, etc.).  DSTAR DV mode voice is 
only 2400 baud with 1200 baud for FEC.  That's a TOUGH target.  It seems 
more likely he could come up with something similar with more bandwidth but 
a drop-in replacement board would require matching those specs.  It's quite 
a task but a major achievement if he pulls it off.

I like the added bass comments.  When I bought my first big screen TV, I 
compared a couple models during a sale.  One of them was the Pioneer Elite 
model that was hand tuned for PERFECT color accuracy.  The Sony XBR was the 
other model we liked (for much less money) but Sony only promised accurate 
skin tones.  As much as I wanted to like the perfect reproduction of the 
Pioneer, it looked so flat compared to the fully saturated color of the 
Sony.  My wife had no interest in the "accuracy" and the price difference 
won me over.  We bought the Sony.  Sure, it was just candy for the eyes or 
"marketing" but it clearly looked better.

Scott N7SS

Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Curt, WE7U" 
Subject: Re: Open DSTAR

Our old buddy Bruce Perens talking about DSTAR and open-source
codecs. Specifically, what needs to be done to improve SPEEX or
other open-source codecs for two-way radio low-bitrate purposes:

More information about the Seatcp mailing list