[wetnetcafe] Looks like we'll have a VHF/UHF SDR this year
steve.stroh at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 10:32:28 PDT 2015
What I've been observing of late is that once an interesting hardware
product actually does get out in the world, "community" tends to form
to support those of us who are in the position you describe (not
capable of kernel hacking).
Case in point is the SainSonic portable tracker - totally inscrutable
from the manufacturer, but it's usable because a community has formed
to support it.
I think it will be the same with both the "Perens project" and the
UDRX - community will form and that will make it usable.
>From what I've observed, I don't think the UDRX is going to be very
user-friendly, for example, no manual.
Speaking of community support, Bill WA7NWP goaded me into "writing
things down", and he found a good platform - free professionally
hosted locked-down-for-editing wikis at http://wikidot.com. It's
better than the (nothing) that I've been doing lately. Check us out:
http://n8gnj.wikidot.com (and more to come, including a more general
page for packet radio in general, and Seattle-area activities, groups,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Kenny Richards <richark at gmail.com> wrote:
> So setting aside my strong dis-like for Bruce and his attitudes, the product
> they are describing has some interesting features. But I haven't seen two
> big things talked about, which is going to be important for people like most
> of us. Problem #1 - they don't seem to have anybody who knows how to take a
> product and mass produce it. And that is a really tough problem. Problem #2
> - Most of us don't want to have a radio which requires hacking the kernel to
> get it to work or for upgrades. We want something a little more "put
> together", since we don't have the math background to 'develop' new
> modulations/codecs or test equipment to play with things at this level.
> Neither of the problems are impossible to solve, but I don't see this group
> getting there. They may lay the ground work for the next group though and
> that is goodness. I just think something like the UDR has a better chance
> given the people involved.
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Steve Stroh <steve.stroh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> One interesting bit was that for their mobile / base version, they're
>> just going to punt on the power amplifier and the output is compatible
>> with Down East Microwave single band amps. Just a quick look at their
>> website and 222 MHz amps are about $200.
>> My $500 play-around budget goes to whoever is willing to take my money
>> de N8GNJ
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "wetnetCafe" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to wetnetcafe+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "wetnetCafe" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to wetnetcafe+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
stevestroh at gmail.com
More information about the Seatcp